Influencing brain activity without surgery, guided by personalised models
Neuromodulation influences the activity of neurons with electric, magnetic or acoustic energy. Deep brain stimulation is effective but requires implanting electrodes through surgery. Non-invasive techniques stimulate the brain through electrodes or transducers on the scalp instead.
We use imaging, computational head models and measurements to make non-invasive stimulation more targeted and more personal, with drug-resistant epilepsy as a key application.
About a third of people with epilepsy continue to have seizures despite medication. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive option, but its effect depends strongly on where the current flows in each individual head. Together with Kempenhaeghe and the 4Brain lab of Ghent University Hospital, we developed a data-driven workflow that uses each patient's MRI and EEG to personalise the electrode montage and target the epileptic focus.
Because many patients with refractory epilepsy have had brain surgery, we also study how skull defects such as burr holes change the current flow, and we built a three-layer MRI-based head phantom to validate transcranial electrical stimulation simulations experimentally. This work is the subject of the PhD thesis of Steven Beumer on the benefit of personalising tDCS in refractory epilepsy (TU/e, 2026).
Conventional transcranial stimulation is strongest at the surface of the brain. Temporal interference (TI) stimulation combines two high-frequency electric fields with a slightly different frequency. Where they overlap, they create a low-frequency envelope that can modulate neurons deeper in the brain, potentially without affecting the tissue in between.
We published a systematic review of all experimental studies of transcranial temporal interference stimulation in humans, co-authored in-human evidence for TI neuromodulation, and analyse how uncertainty in tissue conductivities affects the field that reaches the target.
Every stimulation plan depends on a model of the head, and every model has uncertain tissue properties. We use polynomial chaos expansion to quantify quickly how these uncertainties affect the stimulation, for electrical stimulation as well as low-intensity focused ultrasound. Related work covers wireless power transfer and communication for brain implants, including near-field dosimetry of implant antennas, and simulation platforms for spinal cord stimulation.
The modelling approach is shared with our work in Computational Medicine and Model Inference & Calibration.
Dutch Brain Interface Initiative, an NWO Gravitation programme combining neuroengineering approaches, including neurostimulation.
NWO Cross-over programme on innovative neurotechnology for society.
Epilepsy and sleep expertise centre and e/MTIC partner, where clinical questions on refractory epilepsy are addressed.
Research group of Prof. Paul Boon on neuromodulation for epilepsy, a long-standing partner in personalised stimulation.
NeurotechNL, the Dutch neurotechnology community.
Temporal interference (TI) stimulation applies two high-frequency electric fields with slightly different frequencies through scalp electrodes. Where the fields overlap they produce a low-frequency envelope that can modulate neurons, which may allow deeper brain regions to be targeted non-invasively.
Non-invasive stimulation such as tDCS is being studied as a treatment option for people with drug-resistant epilepsy. Its effect depends on the individual head anatomy, which is why we personalise the stimulation using each patient's MRI and EEG.
No. He is an engineer and scientist. Patients should contact their treating neurologist or an expertise centre such as Kempenhaeghe. See the information for patients (Dutch).
Computational Medicine EM Measurements & Dosimetry Research Vision Voor patiënten (NL)